Tri-Continental Calling Shareholders

On Monday afternoon, I received a call from Georgeson Shareholder regarding the recent Tri-Continental (TY) proxy mailing.  They are working for Tri-Continental and wanted to be sure that I received my proxy from Tri-Continental with the red cover.  The caller also indicated that a competing proxy was also being mailed out shortly, but it would have a gold colored envelope.  The caller from Georgeson Shareholder encouraged me to support management in the vote.  The final vote will be on May 4, 2006.

This is all pretty exciting.  My goal in purchasing Tri-Continental was to take advantage of its large discount to net asset value (NAV).  That gap is slowly starting to close.  As I wrote last month, Western Investment LLC is trying to exert pressure on Tri-Continental to remedy the discount to NAV.  I was really hoping that an activist shareholder would step in and address the discount problem.  It looks like Western Investment is really stepping up to this task by getting a list of shareholders and mailing out a competing proxy.

I’m a bit disappointed that Tri-Continental is putting up a fight on this issue.  However, I believe that Western Investment’s actions will force Tri-Continental to make changes even if Tri-Continental wins the vote.  All this activity is likely creating a catalyst that could unlocking the value of Tri-Continental shares.

3 thoughts on “Tri-Continental Calling Shareholders

  • March 2, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    why not buy Equus II which has a larger discount and an activist as well?

  • March 2, 2006 at 7:51 pm

    I prefer Tri-Continental to Equus II because Tri-Continental is basically a large cap index fund in nature. I like the risk reward ratio of buying an index like asset at a discount.

    Equus II invests 85% of assets in equity and equity-oriented investments in leveraged buyouts or leveraged recapitalizations of medium-sized mostly private companies in the US. That is much riskier than than the assets that Tri-Continental invests in.

    Equus II also has much higher management fees of 3.83%, which probably is one of the reasons for its high discount. Tri-Continental’s management fee is only 0.66%. If I had to own something for a long time before Mr. Market recognized its true value, I’d much rather be paying 0.66% per year than 3.83% per year while I wait for the discount to net asset value to shrink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.