<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value Faceoff: Home Depot vs. Lowe&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/671/value-faceoff-home-depot-vs-lowes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/671/value-faceoff-home-depot-vs-lowes/</link>
	<description>Special situation stocks and value investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: home depot &#187; Comment on Value Faceoff: &#60;b&#62;Home Depot&#60;/b&#62; vs. Loweâ€™s by Turley Muller</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/671/value-faceoff-home-depot-vs-lowes/comment-page-1/#comment-163891</link>
		<dc:creator>home depot &#187; Comment on Value Faceoff: &#60;b&#62;Home Depot&#60;/b&#62; vs. Loweâ€™s by Turley Muller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 06:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/671/value-faceoff-home-depot-vs-lowes/#comment-163891</guid>
		<description>[...] came across this post - Comment on Value Faceoff: &lt;b&gt;Home Depot&lt;/b&gt; vs. Loweâ€™s by Turley Muller - and thought it was worth sharing. I hope you find it interesting too and take the time to read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came across this post &#8211; Comment on Value Faceoff: &lt;b&gt;Home Depot&lt;/b&gt; vs. Loweâ€™s by Turley Muller &#8211; and thought it was worth sharing. I hope you find it interesting too and take the time to read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 52-Week Low List Packed with Quality Names - Fat Pitch Financials</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/671/value-faceoff-home-depot-vs-lowes/comment-page-1/#comment-163216</link>
		<dc:creator>52-Week Low List Packed with Quality Names - Fat Pitch Financials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/671/value-faceoff-home-depot-vs-lowes/#comment-163216</guid>
		<description>[...] Home Depot (HD) caught my attention right away since we have recently been discussing its relative valuation to Lowe&#8217;s(LOW).  I&#8217;ve also notice Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has been on this new lows list repeatedly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Home Depot (HD) caught my attention right away since we have recently been discussing its relative valuation to Lowe&#8217;s(LOW).  I&#8217;ve also notice Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has been on this new lows list repeatedly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turley Muller</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/671/value-faceoff-home-depot-vs-lowes/comment-page-1/#comment-163154</link>
		<dc:creator>Turley Muller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/671/value-faceoff-home-depot-vs-lowes/#comment-163154</guid>
		<description>Home depot is a better value. It may have a PE of 13, which is on depressed eps expectations due home building their sale of wholesale business. I imagine that in a year or two the company will be growing nicely again.  I don&#039;t care about next years or the year after earnings, I care about the next 20 years since a stock&#039;s value reflects the long-run (or should) Taking a more normalized forward eps suggests the P/E is much lower. My DCF calcs show HD is undervalued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Home depot is a better value. It may have a PE of 13, which is on depressed eps expectations due home building their sale of wholesale business. I imagine that in a year or two the company will be growing nicely again.  I don&#8217;t care about next years or the year after earnings, I care about the next 20 years since a stock&#8217;s value reflects the long-run (or should) Taking a more normalized forward eps suggests the P/E is much lower. My DCF calcs show HD is undervalued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

