Sally Beauty’s Moat Springs a Leak
Sally Beauty Holdings (SBH) delivered some bad news last night. The company announced that its Sally Beauty Group LLC (BSG) subsidiary will no longer have exclusive rights to distribute products of the L’Oreal Professional Products Division through its distributor sales consultants or in its stores. BSG’s Armstrong McCall division will not retain the rights to distribute Redken professional products through distributor sales consultants or its stores, but will retain exclusive distribution rights for the Matrix line of products. On a positive note, L’Oreal professional products will remain available in BSG stores that currently carry these products and Sally Beauty Supply stores, which carry a different selection of L’Oreal products from those carried in BSG stores, are not impacted by these developments.
Sally Beauty Holdings (SBH) expects these changes to reduce revenue by $110 million during the last nine months of 2007. This estimate includes additional impact on revenue from other products that may be indirectly affected by these developments.
It appears that Sally Beauty Holdings relationship with L’Oreal has been deteriorating. There was an earlier mention by CEO Winterhalter concerning a loss of sales for BSG East consultants during recent negotiations with L’Oreal that was considered immaterial. This recent news however is material and this loss of business seems to have come as a surprise to Sally Beauty. The cause of this weakening relationship is not apparent to me, especially given that this spin-off from Alberto-Culver (ACV) was done to improve relationships with product manufacturers by eliminating the potential conflict of interest associated with distributing Alberto-Culver products when Sally Beauty was still part of that company.
It will be interesting to see how L’Oreal plans on distributing their products under this new arrangement. I’m trying to find out whether L’Oreal will be adding new distribution partners or whether they plan on doing direct sales to salons. This small leak in Sally Beauty Holdings’ moat will hopefully be quickly patched. However, if further competitive threats attack Sally Beauty, we will have to watch carefully how well the company staves off the threats.
It will also be worth watching what the private investor Clayton, Dubilier & Rice does in light of this new information. Clayton, Dubilier & Rice owns almost half of the equity in this spin-off. I would not be surprised if they add to their position given today’s over 17% drop in SBH stock. This could turn out similar to the way Realogy (H) was recently offered a buyout by private equity firm, Apollo Group.
The potential loss of $110 million in sales is approximately a 5 percent reduction in next years sales given the past twelve month revenue of $2.4 billion. I’m reducing my intrinsic value estimate for Sally Beauty Holdings from $10 to $9 per share given this new information. This 10 percent reduction in my value estimate should more than compensate for the loss of L’Oreal sales if Sally Beauty’s continues to have a sustainable competitive advantage.
Given Mr. Market’s overreaction to today’s bad news, I am debating whether to add Sally Beauty Holdings to the Fat Pitch Financials Portfolio. SBH is already in the Special Situations Real Money Portfolio, but I am considering increasing my position in this stock. What are your thoughts?
Useful Links:
Before you apply for another online loan, make sure you’re not in need of debt advice before you catch yourself in serious debt and even declaring bankruptcy.
Related Posts
8 Responses to “Sally Beauty’s Moat Springs a Leak”
Trackbacks
-
Gannon On InvestingOn Some of My Favorite Sites…
It’s the end of the year. A lot of bloggers try to do something special at this time – make a prediction, summarize the past year, look back, look ahead, etc. I am planning something special for you this weekend. But, for now, I don’t have anything…
-
Festival of Stocks 17 - Fat Pitch Financials[…] Sally Beauty’s Moat Springs a Leak at Fat Pitch Financials A change in the recent spin-off, Sally Beauty Holdings’ relationship with L’Oreal caused shares of the company to drop more than 17 percent. It looks like Mr. Market may have overreacted like usual to this news. Stocks: SBH […]
-
Sally Beauty Holdings - Fat Pitch Financials[…] I think the dumping by mutual funds and index funds has already happened. Index funds need to move quickly in order to minimize index tracking error. If you look at the price and volume history of SBH, you will see a spike in volume when SBH dropped to $7.76 on December 20, 2006. By January 10, 2007, it looks like the selling and volume finally wound down. Note, much of this price decline also came on bad news regarding a change in Sally Beauty Holdings relationship with L’Oreal that I wrote about on December 20th. […]
#1
Sally filed their 10k. I’m invested in SBH as well and will pour through the report before possbly increasing my position.
#2
George,
Here is an interesting write up on Sally that you might enjoy:
http://special-situations.blogspot.com/2006/11/sally-beauty-holdings-sbh-spinoff.html
-Nick
#3
Thanks for the link Nick. I’m looking forward to hearing the upcoming Sally Beauty conference call.
#4
Me too! A few directors purchased shares on the open market in both Nov and Dec. You can see that here: http://www.form4oracle.com/company?cik=0001368458&ticker=sbh
#5
I guess everybody now knows the reason for the split between Sally Beauty Holdings and Loreal. Loreal now has complete control of Beauty Alliance, who competes with Sally Holdings Beauty Systems Group.