<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buffett&#8217;s Opinion of Microsoft&#8217;s Moat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/131/buffetts-opinion-of-microsofts-moat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/131/buffetts-opinion-of-microsofts-moat/</link>
	<description>Special situation stocks and value investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/131/buffetts-opinion-of-microsofts-moat/comment-page-1/#comment-134430</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/?p=131#comment-134430</guid>
		<description>This is exactly what I expected to find out after reading the title s Moat - Fat Pitch Financials. Thanks for informative article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly what I expected to find out after reading the title s Moat &#8211; Fat Pitch Financials. Thanks for informative article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/131/buffetts-opinion-of-microsofts-moat/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/?p=131#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Red Hat is indeed a competitor to Microsoft.  I think the major disadvantage that Linux and OpenOffice has is research and development funding in the long term.  I&#039;m not sure that without a quality revenue stream that the economics of open source software will create the incentives necessary for long-term research in development in improving the software packages the same way Microsoft can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red Hat is indeed a competitor to Microsoft.  I think the major disadvantage that Linux and OpenOffice has is research and development funding in the long term.  I&#8217;m not sure that without a quality revenue stream that the economics of open source software will create the incentives necessary for long-term research in development in improving the software packages the same way Microsoft can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Pidgeon (from Australia)</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/131/buffetts-opinion-of-microsofts-moat/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Pidgeon (from Australia)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/?p=131#comment-457</guid>
		<description>In my mind, Google is not a serious competitor to Microsoft as MS&#039;s revenue streams are so much more diversified than Google&#039;s.

A major, growing competitor is Red Hat (RHAT) though - have you considered the possible impact of open-source software (Linux and OpenOffice in particular) on MS&#039;s moat?

Nice site btw, will definitely be back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my mind, Google is not a serious competitor to Microsoft as MS&#8217;s revenue streams are so much more diversified than Google&#8217;s.</p>
<p>A major, growing competitor is Red Hat (RHAT) though &#8211; have you considered the possible impact of open-source software (Linux and OpenOffice in particular) on MS&#8217;s moat?</p>
<p>Nice site btw, will definitely be back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/131/buffetts-opinion-of-microsofts-moat/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/?p=131#comment-453</guid>
		<description>I doubt that email address works anymore. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that email address works anymore. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sree</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/131/buffetts-opinion-of-microsofts-moat/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Sree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 02:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/?p=131#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Great email and very interesting (although dated) discussion on MSFT.  Think Warren got a few emails since this has been out? :-D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great email and very interesting (although dated) discussion on MSFT.  Think Warren got a few emails since this has been out? :-D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muckdog</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/131/buffetts-opinion-of-microsofts-moat/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>muckdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/?p=131#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Good entry.  I&#039;ve taken a position in MSFT in recent weeks in anticipation of their next product cycle, and was a bit concerned with their revenue guidance last night.  I know it isn&#039;t a go-go growth company anymore, but they are indeed the 800-lb gorilla.  I also think GOOG is overrated as a competitor, especially in the business arena.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good entry.  I&#8217;ve taken a position in MSFT in recent weeks in anticipation of their next product cycle, and was a bit concerned with their revenue guidance last night.  I know it isn&#8217;t a go-go growth company anymore, but they are indeed the 800-lb gorilla.  I also think GOOG is overrated as a competitor, especially in the business arena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shai Dardashti</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/131/buffetts-opinion-of-microsofts-moat/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Shai Dardashti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/?p=131#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Glad you found the article of value.
- Shai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you found the article of value.<br />
- Shai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

